MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061453895

Proyecto de inversión para la instalación de una planta procesadora de arándanos en el departamento de La Libertad, con fines de exportación a Nova Scotia, Canadá 2023

2024· dissertation· es· W7061453895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen air
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El proyecto tiene como objetivo establecer una planta procesadora de arándanos para aprovechar el creciente mercado internacional de esta fruta. El arándano es reconocido por su demanda en el extranjero, de este modo está orientado a fin de exportar a Novoa Scotia, Canadá. Asimismo, la planta procesadora se ubicará estratégicamente en el departamento de La Libertad, ya que cuenta con condiciones climáticas favorables, del mismo modo se encontrará cerca a zonas de cultivo de arándanos para minimizar los costos de transporte y garantizar una cadena de suministro eficiente. Por otro lado, la inversión para la planta procesadora incluirá la adquisición de maquinaria y equipos modernos para el procesamiento, clasificación y envasado de los arándanos, así como se implementarán estrictos estándares de calidad y seguridad alimentaria para asegurar la producción de productos de alto nivel y cumplir con las regulaciones internacionales. Finalmente, se espera que el proyecto genere empleo en la región, brindando oportunidades de trabajo a la población local y contribuyendo al desarrollo económico de la zona. Además, se fomentará el desarrollo sostenible y se promoverán prácticas agrícolas respetuosas con el medio ambiente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207