protocol of diagnosis and of therapy for ankle sprain in the department of urgency in the beauvais hospital : the study of its application for three months the 1ʿ january 2003 to 31 march 2003 enclose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au centre hospitalier de Beauvais, il a été mis en place depuis 2 ans un protocole de prise en charge des entorses de la cheville, aux urgences. Il s'articule autour de quatre axes : Aide au diagnostic à travers une feuille d'observation ; Aide à la prescription des radiographies en respectant les critères d'Ottawa ; Aide à l'orientation thérapeutique en privilégiant le traitement fonctionnel ; Aide à l'orientation secondaire du suivi du patient. Le but de cette étude est de connaître l'application réelle de ce protocole et d'estimer la qualité de son application. Nous avons limité notre étude rétrospective à une durée de 3 mois : 384 traumatismes de la cheville ont été recensés, 184 fiches d'observation type ont été remplies. Dans plus d'un cas sur deux, le protocole a donc été utilisé. Le respect des critères d'Ottawa a été impossible à évaluer. Nous avons cherché à estimer la qualité de remplissage des fiches d'observation. Nous avons étudié les orientations thérapeutiques en fonction de la gravité de l'entorse. Cette étude nous a permis de définir les limites de notre protocole. Nous proposons, pour conclure, certains points qui pourraient aboutir à une meilleure observance de ce dernier
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Protocol About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Protocol About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.079 | 0.083 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".