Prevention of latent national aggression in the course of future teacher education
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© Canadian Center of Science and Education. The basic principles of tolerance, respect for other cultures, readiness for cross-cultural dialogue, basic principles of productive bilingualism are introduced not at school or university, but in kindergarten (age 3-5). At this age, family (parents) and educators play a special role. However, it is in the kindergarten where kids are often badly influenced. The technology of preventing latent national aggression should give students the opportunity to participate in goal-setting, planning their pedagogical activity and its control; ensure their predicting of cross-cultural content, types and results of business or simulation games; when developing the methods of organization of stages in the game, it is necessary to consider the relationship between regulatory, cognitive and communicative components of anticipation. The technology should be based on multicultural content. The values of two cultures, two languages should be disclosed in this content, and positive situations of cross-cultural dialogue should be presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it