Procès-verbal ; suivi de Filiation(s) rompue(s) : mémoire en pièces et tissus de parole dans Parents et amis sont invités à y assister dâHervé Bouchard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La première partie du mémoire consiste en un court texte théâtral intitulé Procès-Verbal. Il met en scène un récit fragmentaire et explore les idées d’éclatement identitaire, de rupture de la mémoire et de mimétisme. Ces thèmes sont mis en relation avec des mécanismes de répétition, un traitement formel minimaliste et d’abondants silences, représentatifs de l’effacement identitaire des personnages.\nLa seconde partie du mémoire, intitulée Filiation(s) rompue(s) : mémoire en pièces et tissus de parole, porte sur le traitement des thèmes de la mémoire et de l’héritage dans le roman Parents et amis sont invités à y assister d’Hervé Bouchard. L’analyse vise à mettre en lumière le lien entre la fragmentation textuelle et la rupture filiale, et s’attarde spécifiquement à la dislocation de la parole, qui témoigne d’une construction identitaire problématique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".