Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this highly original study, Michael Gauvreau, challenges much of the accepted wisdom on Quebec's Quiet Revolution.Until now the Quiet Revolution has been portrayed as an essentially political movement in which secularists came to power because a monolithic and increasingly irrelevant Roman Catholic Church was too mired in conservatism and tradition to respond creatively to the modernizing forces in Quebec society.Gauvreau by contrast portrays the Quiet Revolution as primarily a cultural and social phenomenon with roots, as far back as the 1930s, in a remarkably ideologically diverse Roman Catholic Church.Based on detailed, extensive, and thorough analysis of the activities of Roman Catholic lay people and organizations, particularly those associated with Catholic Action movements, Gauvreau subtly explains how leading Roman Catholics attempted to critique and reform Catholicism beginning in the Great Depression.Between the 1930s and 1960, Catholicism responded creatively to the various intellectual currents, ranging from totalitarianism to individualism, to develop relevant but evolving perspectives on the proper roles of youth, women, families, and the state in a distinctively Catholic society.The Quiet Revolution, more than anything else, is a product of these forces."The central emphasis of the Lesage government," Gauvreau argues, "was to elaborate a new democratic culture by bringing Catholicism more firmly within the machinery of the modern state."But he argues that the period after 1964 was sufficiently distinct that it might better be seen as a second revolution in which Quebec society participated in a trend common to all industrialized Western societies.The thrust of this revolution was "so wedded to an untrammeled individualism that its central implication, as far as Quebec was concerned, was the forceful rejection of a public role for Catholicism."Because this book offers such a dramatic and persuasive break with past scholarship, it will thrust the history of religion into the mainstream of Canadian scholarship.Because much of the reforming zeal that the book explores was aimed at youth and women this book contributes significantly to the history of youth, family, women, sexuality, and gender.And because Gauvreau also grounds his work in international literature and debates, his study should interest historians outside Canada, particularly those interested in the historical process of secularization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.190 | 0.091 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".