PRÃTICAS INTERDISCIPLINARES NO ENSINO PRIMÃRIO: CONCEPÃÃES DE PROFESSORES E FUTUROS PROFESSORES NO QUÃBEC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O texto apresenta, numa perspectiva comparativa, os resultados de duas pesquisas que tratam das concepções de professores e futuros professores em relação a suas práticas interdisciplinares, em contexto de aplicação de novos programas curriculares no ensino primário no Québec (Canadá). Para a realização destes estudos, contamos com a participação de 289 futuros professores (oriundos de quatro universidades francófonas do Québec) e de 81 professores da Comissão Escolar da região de Sherbrooke na Província de Québec. Por meio de uma análise estatística descritiva simples e de uma análise de conteúdo das respostas dos participantes a três questionários distintos, identificamos suas principais concepções referentes à noção de interdisciplinaridade e a sua aplicação em sala de aula. Os resultados analisados revelam uma grande proximidade entre o discurso dos professores e dos futuros professores e sugerem, quando comparados a resultados de pesquisas anteriores, uma grande estabilidade temporal destes discursos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".