Shoreline Geomechanics at Hopewell Rocks Provincial Park, New Brunswick, Canada: Stability of the Elephant Rock, Sentinel, and Lover’s Arch Formations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sea stacks are natural pillars of rock that have been detached by wave action and other erosional processes from adjacent cliff-lined shores. The Hopewell Rocks Provincial Park in New Brunswick, Canada is situated along the coast of the Bay of Fundy, which is home to the largest tidal range in the world. The Park is a popular attraction for geotourism, as it hosts numerous sea stacks and arches that can be accessed on foot during low tide and by kayak during high tide. Approximately 2-3 small scale rockfalls from the cliffs occur at the Park each year, and larger scale rockfalls from the sea stacks occur much less frequently. This research investigates the failure mechanism through a back analysis of the partial collapse of the Elephant Rock formation and the stability of the Sentinel, and Lovers’ Arch formations through a forecast stability analysis using geomechanics numerical models. The primary sea stack failure modes in the Park—block failure, sea stack collapse, and sea arch collapse—are evaluated for the Elephant Rock, Sentinel, and Lover's Arch formations, respectively. The partial failure of the Elephant Rock occurred on March 14th, 2016. The geomechanical interpretation of the failure mechansism is supported by: analyses of a 3D Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry model of the failure surface; photographs taken before and after the failure; historic tidal, climate, and weather data; and the historic rockfall database from the Park. The failure mechanism of the Elephant Rock is interpreted to be a multi-stage combination of toppling and sliding failures. The failure was driven by progressive tidal erosion that increased stresses at the base, and freeze-thaw cycles that gradually opened fractures at the base when salt water (marine) and at the top when fresh water (precipitation) reached their respective freezing points. The forecast stability analyses of the Sentinel sea stack and Lovers’ Arch sea arch formations were completed using 3D finite element method geomechanics numerical models to assess the potential time to failure of the formations. Geometrical input was provided by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based 3D SfM photogrammetry models. Four scenarios were analyzed including the present (2021) geometry of the formations, as well as three simulated reductions in the widths of the pillar within the tidal erosion zone. The rates of erosion were determined to be approximately 3 to 6 mm per year by comparison of historic 20th century photographs and current (2021) photographs. The results from the numerical models in this study indicate that failure may occur in approximately 415 to 500 years after 2021 for the Sentinel formation, and 250 to 300 years after 2021 for the Lover’s Arch formation. The results of this study are the first geomechanical interpretations of a past partial collapse and predictive stability analyses of sea stacks and arches at Hopewell Rocks Provincial Park. The analysis framework presented in this thesis can be applied to other coastal stack and arch formations and used to evaluate the risk of collapse to impact public safety and affect geotourism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".