MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7061741068

REFORMATION AND THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD: ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GROWTH

2025· article· en· W7061741068 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsRedeemer University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChurch GrowthGospelChurch historyConvictionChristianityEcclesiologyChristian ChurchIndigenous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Luther’s reformation resulted in a stream of Christianity called Protestantism, which has snowballed into the establishment of many denominations independent of the Catholic church. It is noteworthy to examine reformation in indigenous Pentecostal churches like the Redeemed Christian Church of God. Adeboye at many fora had expressed resistance to his reforms from many of the elders of the church in his early days as the General Overseer. However, he asserted that he continued with the reforms based on his conviction from the scripture. Through prayer, dexterity, and conviction, he was able to effect changes that have positioned RCCG as the fastest-growing Pentecostal church in Africa, and is still doing so to date. Luther's theory of the priesthood of all believers resonates well with RCCG. Thus, under Adeboye, the ordination of women is allowed. This paper examined some reforms in RCCG and the implications of these on the growth of the church, using historical and observational methods. The paper discovered that RCCG is embracing innovations, creativity, and technology to advance the Gospel and the growth of the church in an ever-changing world. Its ability to adapt to changes and embrace them has led to massive growth, and the paper recommends that the church build a structure that is sustainable and adaptable in a changing world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.017
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.417 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→