THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HYPERMASCULINITY AND FREQUENT BINGE DRINKING AMONG YOUNG UNDERGRADUATE UNIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE MALES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Binge drinking is a considerable problem among male postsecondary students. Research indicates that university and community college populations may differ in their drinking behaviour, and that hypermasculine views may be associated with heavy drinking among males. The two main objectives of this study were to compare the binge drinking patterns of university and community college males and to examine the association between hypermasculinity and frequent binge drinking. Secondary data analyses were conducted using a cross-sectional survey of males attending the University of Western Ontario and Fanshawe College in London, Ontario. Statistical techniques included chi-square tests and modified Poisson regression. UWO (28%) and Fanshawe College (32%) students did not differ significantly in terms of the proportion reporting frequent binge drinking. Hypermasculinity was significantly associated with frequent binge drinking for both UWO (RR: 1.12, 95% Cl: 1.05, 1.19) and Fanshawe College males (RR: 1.16, 95% Cl: 1.10, 1.22), adjusting for covariates
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".