MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061773283

Ritual, Spirituality, and Occupation: A Phenomenological Inquiry into Women’s Participation in Women’s Circles

2012· article· en· W7061773283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)HonourPhenomenonSpiritualityOccupational scienceFocus group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women’s circles have historically existed in many forms, ranging from support and teaching groups that connect generation to generation, to ceremonies honouring the sacred. They are spaces in which women gather to honour and connect to one another, to their environment, and to themselves. Women have claimed that participation in women’s circles replenishes them spiritually and provides meaning and support in their lives. From the available literature and discussion with women who participate in women’s circles, we believe that the occupations associated with participation in women’s circles, or possibly the overall occupation of women’s group participation, can contribute to overall wellbeing in the participants. We are exploring the phenomenon of women’s participation in women’s circles, along with the meanings that women derive from the occupations associated with circle participation.\nThis project examines women’s participation in women’s circles, with a focus on the associated rituals and spirituality from an occupational perspective. This project will add to the growing body of research on the role of ritual in occupation, as the women’s circles tend to be highly ritualized. We are investigating participation in women’s circles as a form of occupation in the lives of women. As such, we will examine the meaningfulness and purpose derived from participation in women’s circles and how these are tied to participants’ daily lives. We will also explore why the participants have chosen (and continue to choose) to participate in women’s circles. The deep meaning that women derive from their participation in women’s circles (Beaird, 2006; Kimmel, 1995; Neu, 1995; personal communications) and the associated rituals are a unique example of human occupation.\nWe are using a phenomenological methodology to explore participation in women’s circles, using semi-structured interviews based on the women’s participation in the circles. We are recruiting from two separate women’s circles in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. The two different circles have slightly different purposes and structures, which will provide insight into diverse rituals and meanings held by participants.\nDiscussion Questions: Does ritual play a unique role in occupation and the meaning derived from participation? How can we as a research community promote the type of wellbeing gleaned from the women’s participation in circles to our communities? The Canadian Model of Occupational Performance had “spirituality” at it’s core, but how broadly do we define it? What does it contribute to people’s lives?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it