MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061802107

A reusable, extensible Netlogo building block of land and housing\nmarkets in a touristic region

2022· article· en· W7061802107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Block (permutation group theory)Process (computing)NetLogoProperty (philosophy)Land useCode (set theory)SuitePlan (archaeology)Conceptual model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an Agent-Based Land Market Model (ABM/LMM) to simulate the complex system of land and property markets, motivated by the recognized suitability of ABMs for modelling these markets. Our ABM/LMM is based on the precepts, concepts and techniques from computer simulation science and economics. It was developed using a collectively designed template for agent-based models of land and housing markets, “MR POTATOHEAD: Property Market Edition,” co-developed by six international teams of complex systems economists. Thus this model can form the kernel for a reusable and flexible code for ABM/LMM land and housing market simulations, as it represents a full suite of developer, investor, land owner, and residential buyers, sellers, and renters agents, following a boundedly rational process of logical reasoning based on incomplete information and limited rationality, in an out-ofequilibrium context with a strong heterogeneity of the agents. Our approach is suited to the geographical context of Corsica (a French Mediterranean Island) but is sufficiently flexible to be adapted to others similar contexts. For this case study, the local state variables of the agents (data, attributes, and methods) come from hedonic regression, spatial econometrics and focus groups. However, as the conceptual model and code design are highly modular, alternative theoretical or empirical decision models/parameterizations could easily be “swapped out”. For next steps, we plan to translate this model to the context of Waterloo Region, Ontario, using existing spatial econometrics and qualitative models developed for that location. Like many locations around the world, both locations face pressing housing affordability challenges and require the development of creative planning solutions that can harness land and housing market forces to ensure sustainable housing development. Thus, our modular modelling environment may offer other municipalities the opportunity to use agent-based modelling to support land development and housing policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University)Same topicNuclear Engineering Thermal-HydraulicsFrench-language works237,207