Report of the special committee (St. John Board of Trade) on the Bay of Fundy and harbor of St. John, N.B. : presented at a meeting held on February 27th, 1887.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
setting with great rapidity over the rocks and shoals, with which it "abounds, and a difficulty of obtaining anchorage on account of "the depth, so that under these circumstances the most unremitting " attention is requisite to prevent disastrous consequences, which must " necessarily attend a want of knowledge and caution."From the tenor of the above statement, and many others of a similarly unfair and untruthful kind which have been met with, it is no wonder that strangers should feel inclined to give a wide berth to a place represented as being so dangerous.In giving rebutting evidence against such statements as the above, your committee have applied only to sources known to be of the most reliable kind, and on whose truth and accuracy the utmost dependence can be placed.First, then : As to the statement that " the atmosphere of the Bay of Fundy is constantly enveloped in dense fogs," your com- mittee would ask reference to a statement made up from the ac- count regularly kept by the keeper of the fog whistle situated at Partridge Island, at the entrance to the harbor of St. John, for the winter months for 17 years from 1870 to 1886, both inclusive.(See No. 1 of Appendix.)The fog average was : Months.h. m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".