MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061817592

Roy Green, interviewed by Tom Spurling, 3 April 2017

2017· other· en· W7061817592 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthGrammar schoolPublishingWork (physics)ExcellenceService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roy Montague Green was born in Ilkeston, England on 25 October 1935. He talks briefly about his childhood in Ilkeston, his secondary education at Ilkeston Grammar School and his university studies at Liverpool University. Roy’s first job was as a trainee engineer with Westinghouse in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. He tells how he decided that he did not want to be an engineer, so enrolled as a PhD student at the University of Toronto. His work was all about the detection of low levels of radiation in people or foodstuffs. It ‘was really to do with chasing where the atomic bomb fallout went.’ He describes his decision to accept a position at the AAEC in Lucas Heights and his journey to Sydney from Toronto via England and Perth, where he married Robin Wendy Shields, and his subsequent decision to leave the AAEC. He returned to Canada to work in the RCA Research Laboratories in Montreal. It was as the Director Research Program Development, that he developed skills that were very useful in his future roles. Roy came back to Australia in December 1971 to establish WAIT‐AID Ltd, the technology transfer company of the then Western Australian Institute of Technology. He discusses his approach to enlisting the staff to external engagement. There follows a section where Roy talks about his move to the Commonwealth Public Service in Canberra in 1975 during the final months of the Whitlam Government, and his subsequent roles at ASTEC and the Department of Science and Technology. Roy recounts his recruitment to CSIRO as the Director of the Institute of Natural Resources and the Environment, his successes in building large externally funded projects and his brief time as Chief Executive of the Organisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207