Role of liver fatty acid binding protein in fatty liver cell culture model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liver fatty acid binding protein has been reported to possess antioxidant properties in the liver. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of this protein in a nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cell culture model. Rat hepatoma cells were treated with an oleate:palmitate (2:1) mixture for either 1 and 2 days, or further treated with 500 µM clofibrate to induce L-FABP expression. Intracellular lipid accumulation was quantitated by Nile Red. Lipotoxicity was determined using the WST-1 assay. Dichlorofluorescein (DCF) was utilized to assess intracellular reactive oxidative species (ROS) level. Measurement of lipotoxicity showed statistical decreases in cell viability as lipid concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner. NAFLD cell cultures showed characteristic cellular damage from increased ROS levels in fatty acid treated cells. All groups treated with clofibrate showed statistically increased intracellular L-FABP levels and reduced ROS levels. The results lead to the conclusion that clofibrate induces L-FABP expression and in this manner suppresses hepatocellular ROS generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".