MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061840746

Search for <i>B</i><sub><i>s</i></sub><sup>0</sup>→ μ<sup>+</sup> μ<sup>-</sup> decays at D0

2007· article· en· W7061840746 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos AiresInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESPCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyVetenskapsrådetConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroWestern Canada Research GridKorea Science and Engineering FoundationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGrantová Agentura České RepublikyDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Federal Agency for Science and InnovationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungFermilabScience Foundation IrelandNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTevatronFermilabBranching fractionLimit (mathematics)Particle decayFraction (chemistry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report results from a search for the decay Bs0 → μ+μ- using 1.3 fb-1 of pp̅ collisions at √s= 1.96 TeV collected by the D0 experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider.We find two candidate events, consistent with the expected background of 1.24 ± 0.99, and set an upper limit on the branching fraction of Ɓ(Bs0 → μ+μ-) < 1.2 x 10-7 at the 95% C.L.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0140.016
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.010
Bibliometrics0.0100.014
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0200.014
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207