The Schools called Public Schools of Manitoba are in reality Protestant schools.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arethe Public Schools of Manitoba the Continuation of the Protestant Schools of the same Province."Having learned that the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council had rendered a decision contrary to the interests of the Catholics of Manitoba on the school question, I thought it my duty to claim anew the intervention of the federal authorities, and I did so, in a petition addressed to his Excellency the Governor-General-in-Council.A para- graph of that petition has attracted es- pecial attention, both in the Commons and* in the press.Here is the paragraph : "That two statutes, 53 Vic, chap.tember.Its first parliament was sum- moned for and opened the 15th day of March, 1871.One of the first tasks of the new legislature was the question of public instruction and on the 3rd May, the Lieut- enant-Governor assented to a law, passed under the title "An Act to establish' a System of Education in the Province."While entering in such a grave question, the government, the legislative coun- cil and the legislative assembly of the new province had to look, and in fact did look, into the constitution of Canada, British North America Act, 18(57, clause 98, and into the constitution of the Province of Manitoba, "Manitoba Act, 1870," clause 22, for guidance in their task.They easily found there two things.1st.That the provincial authorities are not absolute in matters of education.2nd.That, regarding the same matter, the constitution of the whole Dominion, and the constitution of Manitoba both recog- nized that the "Subjects of the Queen," formed two different sections, named respectively " Protestant" and " Roman Catholic," and that, even if one of the sections was in a minority in any pro- vince.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".