MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061883523

Sedimentology and stratigraphy of the northern and central metasedimentary belts in the Beardmore-Geraldton area of northern Ontario / by Jonathan Ross Devaney. --

2017· other· en· W7061883523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubaerialConglomerateSedimentologyFaciesSedimentary depositional environmentStratigraphySlumpingFelsicTerraneSedimentary rockIntertidal zone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The northern and central metasedimentary belts (NMB,
\nCMB) are east-trending, regional (formation- to group-scale)
\niithostratigraphic units within the Beardmore-Geraldton
\nArchean terrane of northern Ontario's Superior Province.
\nGravelly braided rivers deposited the lithofacies
\nassemblage of clast-supported polymict conglomerate and interbedded sandstone that comprises most of the NMB. Felsic
\nvolcanic pebbles and cobbles are the most abundant clast
\nlithology.
\nThe CMB contains several east-trendinq lithofacies
\nassemblages that together form a generally northward coarsening
\nsequence. The southern CMB is composed of
\nmudstone, iron formation and sandstone with common graded
\nbeds. This fine-grained assemblage is paralleled to the
\nnorth by a horizon of rhythmically bedded and cross-bedded
\nsandstone units, and a heterogeneous, conglomerate-rich
\nassemblage. The northern CMB strata are mostly a conglomeratic
\nassemblage similar in form (lithofacies) and composition
\n(provenance) to the NMB. Some fine-grained units
\n(mudstone. iron formation, graded sandstone) of relatively
\nminor regional extent are present near the north margin of
\nthe CMB.
\nThe CMB's southern (lower) fine-grained subaqueous
\nfacies are apparently capped at different sites by: 1)
\nrhythmic delta front couplets; 2) sandy braided river
\ndeposits with very rare associated intertidal strata; and 3)
\na conglomeratic submarine fan or fan-delta front resedimented
\nassemblage. The northern (upper) CMB is a gravelly braided
\nriver deposit, with minor aquabasinal facies.
\nThe CMB is probably a 1-2 km thick structurally modified
\nhomoclinal sequence. Relative positions of its depositional paleoenvironments, as deduced from lithofacies
\nassemblages, suggest that the epiclastic portion of the CMB
\nis the record of a dominantly coarsening-upward, subaqueous to subaerial trend that was produced by a prograding clastic
\nsystem(s), likely a number of fan-deltas.
\nThe extreme eastern part of the CMB is composed of
\ngenerally oligomict, coarse (conglomeratic) felsic pyroclastic
\nand/or reworked volcaniclastic facies which are
\nprobably subaerial deposits.
\nSimilar clast compositions and several sedimentoiogical
\ncriteria, including average maximum deformed clast size,
\nstrongly suggest that highly proximal fluvial facies in the
\nNMB and more distal fluvial and aquabasinal facies in the CMB
\nwere originally part of a continuous coarse clastic wedge or
\nsheet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207