MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061958359

Should the Rainbow have Black and Brown Stripes?: (Anti)-Racism and Coalitions in Toronto’s Rainbow Community

2020· dissertation· en· W7061958359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerEthnographyWhite (mutation)PrideRacismIndigenousStorytellingRainbowIntersectionality
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My dissertation research undertakes an in-depth analysis of queer (anti)-racism in Toronto’s rainbow community. My study is informed by ethnographic research methods, including semi-structured interviews with those who self-identify as part of the rainbow community, and my own observations at queer-focused events in Toronto such as the Greenspace Festival by the 519 and Pride Toronto’s annual parade. My analysis and findings are presented in three publishable articles. This portfolio-style dissertation manuscript also includes photographic images from my field work, and the script from my stage production We without You, an original theatre project that I created to reflect, analyse and disseminate my ethnographic research. In the first article I discuss how languages of capital accumulation, white (homo)nationalism and safety, are mobilized in order to produce race and racism in queer politics. Within contexts of intersectional tension I analyse how self-identified white participants conceptualize anti-racism allyship. In my second article I explore how conflict and confusion about appropriate allyship produced self-exclusion from anti-racism efforts. I found that allies experience tension as to their roles and potential responsibilities in relation to anti-racism, which often results in being uninformed about race-related issues and/or in their non-participation in anti-racism. With data and analysis from my first two articles I wrote and produced a stage production entitled We without You. The production is a knowledge mobilization project that addresses gaps in public knowledge and informs audiences about a range of experiences in the rainbow community shaped by intersections of race and queerness. My experiences writing and producing We without You and the role of performance as critical resistance against polarizing politics is the subject of my third article. I argue that performance as knowledge mobilization plays a crucial role in bridging academic work with public engagement by positioning sociological inquiry as an important contributor to public life. As a whole, this dissertation explores how race is produced in the rainbow community, examines the tensions involved with anti-racism allyship, and demonstrates the power of performance as critical resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it