MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061965486

Statistics in Focus. AGRICULTURAL PRICE TRENDS IN THE EU IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1999. 2000.3

2000· other· en· W7061965486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)AgriculturePrice indexStatistical analysisOfficial statistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Annual change ¡n the real output price index, 3nd quarter 1999 (in %) 0 -4.1 -40 -3.7 -3.6 -5.0 -4-9 -6.1 -60The index of prices of agricultural products for the European Union (EU15) declined in both nominal terms (4.2%) and real terms (5.6%) in the third quarter of 1999 relative to the corresponding quarter of the previous year.This decline accentuates the trend seen throughout 1998 and early 1999.The decrease in the total price index was due to price declines for both crop products (6.9%) and animals and animal products (4.3%).There was a steep price decline for fruit (21.1%).However, prices of cereals, with the arrival of a new harvest, were close to the level seen in the third quarter of 1998.The price decline for pigs was finally halted although the price index remains at a low level.The real price decline for milk was accentuated.For all Member States (see graph) there were declines in the real total output price index.Decreases ranged from 1.3% in Austria to 10.1% in Belgium and 10.6% in the Netherlands.The index of prices of the means of agricultural production, i.e. the input price index, showed little change for EU15 in nominal terms (+0.1%) and declined in real terms (1.2%).Prices for energy increased while prices for fertilizers and animal feedingstuffs decreased.Changes in the total input price index ranged from +0.8% in Belgium to 3.9% in the Netherlands.The agricultural terms of trade (output prices vs. input prices) declined significantly (4.4%).^ eurostat

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.018
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh)Same topicAdvanced Power Generation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207