MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061994936

Satellite cell activation in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) single muscle fibre cultures

2013· dissertation· en· W7061994936 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDirectorate for Biological Sciences
KeywordsZebrafishHepatocyte growth factorSkeletal muscleMyocyteBromodeoxyuridineNitric oxideCellCell growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite cells (SCs) are muscle stem cells that stay in a metabolically and mitotically quiescent state in adult skeletal muscle until activated. In mammals, SCs are activated and enter into the cell cycle for growth and regeneration. The mechanism initiating SC activation in vivo and in vitro, mediated by nitric oxide (NO) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is described in the mouse model, but not in other species. Here, we assessed SC activation by counting bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-immuno-positive cells, and found that SC activation in zebrafish single muscle-fibre cultures is also NO and HGF dependent, peaking at 1 mM isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN, an NO donor drug) and 10 ng/mL HGF respectively, using dose-response experiments. Moreover, HGF signalling via the c-Met receptor is involved in the SC activation pathway and is considerably affected by temperature (i.e., 21 °C). Overall, understanding NO-HGF-c-Met signalling in SC activation gives new insights on fish muscle growth and conservation of regulatory pathways between species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicAdvanced Power Generation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207