Sobre la relació entre pedagogia i filosofia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aquest és el text de la ponencia presentada a la Far Western Philosophy of Education Society Conference M' agradaria examinar aquí algunes de les categories fona- mentals de la tradició de les ciencies humanes dins la teoria pedagogica continental.La tradició de la Geisteswissenschaftliche Padagogik va ser conseqiiencia d'una reacció cultural al racionalisme il.lustrat de períodes anteriors en el pensament continental.A lfAlemanya del segle xx, el moviment Geisteswissenschaflliche va representar principalment un desenvolupament pedagogic.El meu objectiu amb aquesta exploració d'alguns aspectes de la tradició alemanya i holandesa de les ciencies humanes en educació es proporcionar un teló de fons a la teorització contemporinia sobre l'educació a America del Nord, concretament en referPncia al concepte de pedagogia.En el camp de l'educació, el desenvolupament de la Geisteswis- senschaflliche Padagogik (tradui'da maldestrament com a "Pedagogia de les ciencies humanes") tenia els seus precedents en el que s'ha anomenat "el Moviment alemany" del segle XVIII (vegeu Danner, 1979; Imelman, 1979; i en particular llexcel.lentestudi de Hintjes, 1981).Alguns
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".