Structure of 25Na measured using \nd(24Na, p)25Na with a radioactive 24Na \nbeam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure of 25Na is studied using the (d, p) transfer reaction using the ISAC-II accelerator at TRIUMF, Canada. An 8 MeV per nucleon beam of 24Na, incident onto a 1.0 mg CD2 target was used to populate excited states in 25Na. The target was surrounded by the SHARC and TIGRESS arrays, which were used to detect the ejected protons, and coincident gamma-rays emitted from the excited 25Na nuclei respectively. The angular distribution of the protons has been analysed for each state observed and compared to the theoretical distributions generated using TWOFNR to get a value of the spectroscopic factors. Data were compared to WBC shell-model calculations in order to assign spin and parities to each observed state. States at 2.788 MeV and 3.455 MeV are strongly populated and show a strong s-wave contribution to the wave functions. \n \nIn addition, the structure of the astrophysically relevant mirror nucleus 25Si is commented \non. The reaction 24Al(p, gamma)25Si reaction is thought to occur in hot stellar environments, but little to no experimental data exist that confirm reaction rates calculated for this reaction. The spectroscopic factors found in this work for 25Na are used as a point of comparison and used to determine the validity of theoretical reaction rate calculations used for the astrophysical reaction. The relevant energy region in the reaction 24Al(p, gamma)25Si is between the proton separation energy of 3.414 and 4 MeV. Two states \nare observed in this energy range in 25Na at 3.455 and 3.995 MeV, though the 3.455 MeV state is expected to be Thomas-Ehrman shifted below the 3.414 MeV threshold in \nthe mirror 25Si. The state at 3.995 MeV was found to have an s-wave component that matched the predicted value from literature. No other states were observed within the \nrelevant energy region in 25Na.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".