Short-term retention of popular music in older adults: Supports for a plasticity theory of implicit music knowledge acquisition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on our Plasticity Theory of Implicit Music Knowledge Acquisition (PTIMKA), we tested the hypothesis that adolescence is a sensitive period for acquiring musical information, including a lifelong musical grammar. Older adults (N = 27, mean age = 65.7 years; SD = 6.7) identified artist, title, and year of popularity and rated their familiarity for short excerpts of 36 songs popular between 1962 and 2021. Knowledge and familiarity were greater for music popular during the participants’ adolescence. A subsequent surprise retention task required participants to choose which of 2 excerpts had been presented in the first task. For each of 36 trials, targets and foils represented the same era of popularity. Retention (dꞌ) and confidence in retention judgment were also stronger for the songs of adolescence, even though targets of all eras had just been presented in the previous 15 minutes. It is argued that popular music styles congruent with an adolescence-established grammar were more accurately encoded than styles violating this grammar, as would songs popular before or after adolescence. Prior data from younger adults showing trajectories opposite to those for older adults as a function of decade of popularity are further consistent with this interpretation and with PTIMKA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it