MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062211195

A study on the relationship between Malaysia outward foreign direct investment and U.S Dollar, Singapore Dollar and U.K Pound Sterling / Nik Dini Daziani Nik Derahman

2007· other· en· W7062211195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentLiberian dollarQuarter (Canadian coin)Exchange ratePound (networking)Foreign exchangeVolatility (finance)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study focuses on the relationship between me exchange rate (MYR/USO, MYR/SGD and MYR/E) with the Malaysia outflow foreign direct investment. The main purposes of this study Is to identify whether the independent variabIe. the exchange rate has a significant relationship with Malaysia outward foreign dired investment or not. The volatility of Malaysia outward foreign direct investmem from 1991 to 2006 has shown an unstable panem which inconsistently appreciated and sometimes depreciated. The secondary data collected for ‘his study consists of Malaysia outward foreign direct investment starting from the 1" quarter of 1991 to the 3’“ quarter of 2006. Meanwhile, the data for exchange rate is collected in monthly basis from year 1991 m 2006. However in order to standardize the data, it has been presented on quarterly basis. This study uses simple linear regression model to the data. Based on the analysis from simple linear regression, only MYR/USD and MYR/SGD have significant relationship which represents the Malaysia outward foreign direct investment, Meanwhile, UKI£ shows no significam rela‘ionship towards Malaysia outward foreign direct investment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207