MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7062232483

Source, attenuation, and potential mobility of arsenic at New Britannia Mine, Snow Lake, MB

2007· dissertation· en· W7062232483 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenicArsenopyriteTailingsAquiferGroundwaterArsenic contamination of groundwaterSnowEnvironmental remediation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concentrations of arsenic, averaging 17 ppm, are present in groundwater below a tailings disposal area, down gradient from an arsenopyrite residue stockpile (ARS) containing pore water concentrations of 100 ppm arsenic at New Britannia Mine (NBM), Snow Lake, Manitoba. Hydrogeological modeling illustrates arsenic contaminated groundwater will continue to percolate through the base of the ARS and into the local aquifer so long as there is a source concentration. Geochemical distribution of arsenic in surface and pore water (< 8.7 and 9.0 ppm), solids (< 17800 ppm), and plants (< 13600 ppm) along a flow path from the mine to Snow Lake are above Canadian guidelines. Safe levels of arsenic were measured in Snow Lake. Mineralogical investigations of solids by SEM, EMPA, and u-XRD show arsenic bound to secondary hydrous ferric oxides. Both dissolved and solid phase arsenic are mobile. Arsenic reducing bacteria thrive, thereby enhancing the conversion of arsenic to its more mobile and toxic form. Future monitoring and remediation recommendations for NBM are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→