MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062311739

This is what we have, this is what we don’t have, this is what we need : The post-incarceration experiences of formerly incarcerated Black women in Canada

2024· other· en· W7062311739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersectionalityPrisonBlack womenQualitative researchPopulationFocus groupSocioeconomic statusFace (sociological concept)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, the burgeoning population of racialized women in Canadian prisons has begun to capture the attention of scholars. While there is widespread and growing awareness that Black women are disproportionately represented within these prisons, the research literature on the post-incarceration experiences of this population remains scant. The challenges that Black women encounter post-incarceration are riddled with sequelae of the structural discrimination that Black women experience both inside and outside of prison walls. The current work aims to uncover the diverse challenges that Black women face on their trajectory towards rebuilding their lives after prison in order to bolster our understanding of the uniquely complex and intersectional post-incarceration experiences of Black women in Canada. This study will also investigate the efficacy of ongoing initiatives and programming available to support formerly incarcerated women with reintegration into their communities. To address these aims, I adopted a qualitative study design utilizing a semi-structured interview approach to examine the post-incarceration experiences of 18 relevant stakeholders as they relate to the experiences of reintegration of formerly incarcerated Black women, with a specific focus on the impact of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. The sample was comprised of formerly incarcerated Black women (n = 13), non-Black formerly incarcerated women (n = 1), community organization members (n = 1), prison rights advocates (n = 2), and politicians (n = 1). \n\nDrawing upon fundamental Black feminist theories of law (e.g., intersectionality and critical race theory), I analyzed qualitative interview data by employing content analysis to uncover salient themes. The results indicated that for formerly incarcerated Black women, reintegration involves overcoming robust structural barriers, including difficulties securing employment, stigmatization, and lack of effective support. The insights shared by participants in the current study highlight the extent to which Black women’s marginalized identities adversely shape their experiences pre- and post-incarceration. Evidently, the reintegration experiences of formerly incarcerated Black women are unique and shaped by a multitude of factors. The current work shines light on the need for further investigations and efforts to mitigate post-release challenges in order to promote equitable post-incarceration experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.015
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it