MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062344550

Travel Routes, Harvesting and Climate Change in Ulukhaktok, Canada

2008· article· en· W7062344550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeArcticTourismNatural hazardEffects of global warmingThe arcticGlobal warmingLand use
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents research that integrates natural and social science data with the knowledge from community members to document the implications of climate change for travel routes, used by community members in Ulukhaktok to access seasonal harvesting grounds, and how policy decisions can enhance capacity to adapt in the future. It outlines steps for engaging arctic communities in climate change research and describes an approach to assessing vulnerability. The approach is applied in a case study for the community of Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories (NT), Canada. Information was collected from a triangulated set of resources including, community reports, climate records, existing research, and 62 in-depth interviews with community members. Data indicates that climate change together with societal changes have resulted in compromised trail routes to harvesting grounds and increased hazards for travelers. Current adaptive strategies involve traveling via alternative modes of transportation and travel routes, taking extra precautions before and during travel and sharing country foods. Adaptations are not universal among community members and changing trail conditions have resulted in community members spending less time traveling on the land harvesting country foods which has implications for food security, local economy, cultural preservation and health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207