Student Independent Projects Social Cultural Studies 2014: \n \n
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social/Cultural Studies students at Grenfell Campus, Memorial University are required to complete an independent research project that reflects the conceptual and methodological skills acquired during their program of studies. The independent project allows each student to conduct an in-depth study on a research question of their own choosing. \nThe papers in this volume illustrate the diverse ways in which students have employed various concepts and theories from anthropology, folklore and sociology – the core cognates of the Social/Cultural Studies programme, and from historical studies. \nIn their research, the 2014 students have investigated how socially and culturally-embedded ideas impact on a number of issues. Using a Latourian approach, involving the impact of human and non-human actants, Amanda Doyle discusses the concept of social stigma among social housing residents in Dunfield Park, Corner Brook. Assunta Joyce employs phenomenological theory and field-based methodologies to reveal and explain concepts of home among resettled residents of Wood’s Island (Bay of Islands) and their descendants. And, finally, Krystal LeRoy explores the relationship between faith-healing within Teen Challenge (a faith-based drug rehabilitation program) and addiction recovery. \nIndependent project supervision for 2014 students is as follows: Zedenka Chloubova, supervisor and Dr. Angela Robinson, second-reader for Amanda Doyle; Dr. Angela Robinson, supervisor and Dr. Doreen Klassen second-reader for Assunta Joyce; Dr. John Bodner, supervisor and Dr. Doreen Klassen, second-reader for Krystal LeRoy. Students completing their projects this year were also taught by Dr. Marie Croll, Dr. Rainer Baehre, Dr. Christine Kennedy, Christine Abbott and Marla Riehl. \nOn behalf of Social/Cultural Studies faculty, I would like to congratulate the students whose papers comprise this volume. We are pleased with our students’ commitment to studying and articulating social/cultural issues and wish them every success as they build
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.479 | 0.228 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".