MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062382506

Sums due Chippewa and other Indians. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, transmitting reports of the amounts due Chippewa, Ottawa, and other Indians now residing in the State of Michigan

2016· other· en· W7062382506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)VirtueGovernment (linguistics)State governmentIndependent state
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reports if tlu amounts due Chippewa, -Ottawa, and other• Indians now residing in the State if JJfichigan.DECEMBER 23, 1862.-Referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs and ordered to be printed. SUMS DUE CHIPPEWA AND OTH ER INDIANE'.No payments were made to the Indians who remained in Michigan untill843.]<'rom that date until the last year $1, 587 50 have been paid each y ear, and divided among them.I transmit herewith a report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, in which he estimates the amount due to that portion of the nation who remained in Michigan, in pursuance of tbe supplementary treaty of September 27, 1833, at $73, 112 50.'Whatever sum may be found due to these Indian~ must be paid from the sum due to the Pottawatomie nation.I am not informed of the data upon which the estimate of the Commissioner is made, nor have I been able to procure from the Indian office such information as would enable me to report to Congress the amount clue to the band remaining• in Michigan.As the report of the Commissioner was only made on the 15th ultimo, there has not been sufficient time to procure the necessary information and enable me to report during the present session of Congress.'l'he band which, by the supplementary treaty, was permitted to remain in Michigan must be regarded as a part of the Pottawatomie nation.They are entitled to receive, per capita, their proportion of the annuities and other payments provided for in the several treaties with the nation to the same extent they would have been if they had g•one west with the tribe.To determine the amount due to them it is necessary to ascertain the number in Kansas at the elate of the several payments, and the number of those of the band who, by the supplementary treaty, were permitted to remain in Michigan, and of their descendants at the same periods.'l'his information cannot•be obtained from the records of the Indian office.Believing the report of the Commissioner upon the amount clue to the Pottawatomie nation to be substantially correct, I recommend an appropriation of that amount, with instructions to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, under the directions of the Secretary of the Interior, to ascertain the amount clue to that portion of the nation who remained in Michigan under the stipulations of the -supplementary treaty, and to pay the same from the appropriation for the benefit of the nation.. Very respectfully , your obedient servant,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2910.159

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207