Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been a significant increase in housing development in the Greater Toronto \nArea over the past fifty years, and all signs indicate that this will continue in the near \nfuture. The unsustainable practices of suburban developments must be addressed. \nThis thesis will look at the history of suburban developments from post-war times \nto current practices, with a focus on the lack of identity of a place, the loss of \necosystems, and hyper-individualism. It will also look at ways to improve tomorrow’s \nsuburban developments through placemaking, energy-efficient design and \nimplementation of green technologies like Net Zero and district energy to manage \nand reduce the energy consumed by these developments. The thesis will consider \nthese elements and practices to create a plan to lay the groundwork for the future \ncommunity development. The main design proposal of this thesis will be for phase \none of the plan, which focuses on creating a place and providing identity to the site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it