Bibliographic record
Abstract
De lichamen van jonge verslaafde meiden in de Down Town East Side van Vancouver, die veelal een pleegzorg achtergrond hebben, kunnen ons iets vertellen over de heersende machtsrelaties binnen en buiten hun gemeenschap. De aanleiding en gevolgen van hun weg naar “down town” laten zien dat de concepten home en belonging (Hannerz 2002) er voor hen toe doen. In hun zoektocht naar belonging raken deze meiden verstrikt in (oude) trauma(s) en drugs en zetten zij hun seksuele lichaam in om hun verslaving te kunnen voeden. Het lichaam neemt binnen de antropologie een belangrijke plek in. Het lichaam is een sociaal culturele constructie en is daarom van belang te betrekken bij de bestudering van processen rondom gender, macht en multiculturalisme. Schijnbare tegenstellingen zoals kind vs. volwassene zoals gehanteerd in het internationale hulpdebat over kinderen en jongeren in de seksindustrie (O’Connell Davidson 2005, Oude Breuil 2008), zijn ontoereikend om deze complexe vorm van jeugdprostitutie te begrijpen. Aan de hand van het concept social navigation (Vigh 2003) wordt een completer perspectief op de meiden, hun lichaam en hun handelingsruimte geschetst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.110 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".