Turner's List of the Birds of Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3(55 ]?ecenl L/lera/ure.and the writer of this review, at frequent intervals fi'om early in December till into March, which differ not in the least in respect to the black facemarl, tugs from summer specimens.Anti similar examples are, to our knowledge, in various collections, both public and private, notably in those of Messrs. Brewster, Cory, and others, and that of Princeton College.Four beautiful plates illustrate Mr. Sharpe's monograph of the Mniotilttrite, in xvhich are figured the heads of eight species of Geolhl:y]SL% while fifil-leugth fig'ures are given of G. s]Sec/osa, Parula ]5oe1oeayumoe, P. n(rilora, Terelrislis fernandina, and T. fornsi.The geuus Po[oeolSlila (with 3 species) is noticed in an 'Appendix to the family Mniotiltidre' (pp.440-445), the group having been omitted hy Mr. Seebohm from the Sylviidte, where authors have generally placed it.Mr. Sharpe believes that their most natural position is "in the vicinity o' the Muscicapine genus Sletoslira."lu the family Motacillidm, the Field Wagtails, usually separated as a genus ludyles, are placed with the XVater Wagtails under the single genus 3Iotacilia, there beiug "certain intermediate species .... which unite these twu supposed genera."Yet he considers it expedient to continue the generic separation of Anlh,s %ra3rue[ from Anthtes proper, under the.genus xWeocor.?s.As already noticed tattle?t, p. 290, footnote), our Titlark is made a suhspecies of the Old World Water Pipit, An/,5tts st'olella.(sb/tolella Linn., and 'auct.plur.'),under which it stands as "Subsp.Anl/ts 5bentsylzsanh'us."A similar disposition of it was made previously by Mr. Seebohm (llist.Brit.Bds., II, 'I$$3, p. 248).The adoption o' 'radical changes' in specific names, whet called foc by nomenclatnral rnlesdocsnot seem to inspire in ouranthor, weareglad to see, the same degree of dread as 'radical changes' in generic names, thogh ve iM1 to trace any principle of cnnsistencyin such diverse actiou under similar contingencies.|. A. A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".