MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062585265

Une onzième province? La promotion du développement régional en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 1960-1970

2001· other· fr· W7062585265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2001
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationVettingPrivate enterprise
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce mémoire de maîtrise tentera d'apporter un regard neuf sur l'évolution de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue entre les années 1960 à 1970. Cette période sera à la fois marquée par une prise de conscience des nombreux problèmes présents dans cette région et d'une mobilisation de la population pour prendre en main son avenir. À travers les efforts de consolidation des acquis régionaux et de développement, on verra naître un mouvement singulier: le comité de la onzième province. Un petit groupe revendiquera, auprès des autorités gouvernementales, des grandes compagnies et des médias, des changements dans la gestion de la région. Ce groupe menacera de créer une nouvelle province canadienne dans l'éventualité où leurs demandes ne seraient pas acceptées. Nous examinerons ainsi quels ont été les impacts du projet pour la onzième province et des organismes voués au développement de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue sur la croissance de cette région.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it