Vécu des résidents d’EHPAD ayant expérimenté la crèche intergénérationnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: residential care home is the last living place for one quarter of elderly people. These last ones have fundamentals needs such as social link and sense of usefulness. To fill them, establishments coupling a residential care home and a nursery have emerged. The main purpose of this study was to explore the way the activities between care home residents and nursery children were felt by the residents who experienced them. Design and methods: it was a qualitative study, inspired of interpretative phenomenological analysis, to explore the way the activities with children of intergenerational nurseries had been experienced by the residents of the associated care homes. It included residents of care homes coupled with an intergenerational nursery, declared able to answer to an interview for at least 30 minutes by staff, and who participated to at least one common activity with nursery children. Results: the study included nine participants. It shoed that activities with children provided team distraction to the residents and keep them active, but the interactions where too much superficial and limited by youngness of the children. Reviving of memories, transmission of knowledge and sense of usefulness where the main strength of these exchanges. Conclusion: intergenerational activities in residential care homes help to minimize loneliness by varied and shared activities. They have a positive effect on the psycho-social well-being by refresh pleasant memories and providing some feeling of usefulness. Developing these activities seems interesting in order to continue integrating the elderly into the society and slow down ageism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".