Vapour permeances, air permeances and water absorption coefficients of building membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building membranes are integral parts of North American Buildings. Some are installed beneath commonly used exterior claddings, brick and stucco to reduce the risk of water infiltration into the wall systems. Others are used for controlling vapor diffusion though the envelope or as the airtight element of the air barrier system of the envelope. To determine the suitability of a membrane for its intended application, it is necessary to have reliable information on its inherent physical properties. This paper reports the water vapor permeance, the air permeance, and the water absorption coefficient for 18 building membranes that are found in North American markets today. These membranes include paper-based as well as polymer-based materials. The properties reported here show that at the design stage most of the membranes can be considered as the airtight element of air barrier systems and as part of the second line of defense against rainwater penetration. The membranes provide a range of values for water vapor permeance and therefore open up opportunities for a designer to integrate innovative vapor diffusion control strategies for exterior walls and to prolong their service lives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".