UQAUSIVUT: Our Language – Implementing Made-in-Nunavut Language Legislation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protection and promotion of Inuit culture was identified as one of the most important goals for the creation of Nunavut, and language is one of the most important elements of Inuit culture. In 2008, Nunavut adopted a groundbreaking language legislative package to protect the Inuit language in the most significant way. In order to respond to the pressures confronting the Inuit language, and to ensure that its quality and prevalence are protected and promoted, the Government of Nunavut presented in 2012 Uqausivut, a comprehensive plan to coordinate a number of government language programs and services. This article provides an overview of Nunavut’s new language policy framework, and how the territorial government intends to take positive action to protect, revitalize and promote the Inuit Language across the Territory. \n \nLa protection et la promotion de la culture inuite ont été identifiées comme parmi les plus importants objectifs pour la création du Nunavu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".