Writings of an ancient poet : a theological composition of Aurelius Prudentius Clemens’ soteriology as depicted in his Liber Cathemerinon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By his poetic declarations concerning Jesus Christ, Prudentius appeals to some as a\nflagship for fourth-century Nicene theology. This thesis investigates the poet’s concept of\nsalvation to determine its congruity with Nicaea’s underlying soteriology. To that end,\nAthanasius’ Against the Gentiles-On the Incarnation and Prudentius’ Liber Cathemerinon\nare read in juxtaposition, drawing out and comparing theological themes. Prudentius\nexhibits an inherent fixation on the problem of sin and its effect on salvation. This\ndiminishes the significance and hope offered by the Incarnation. Yet, Athanasius purports\nthat Nicaea’s Christological proclamations are founded on God’s saving action in Jesus’\nlife, death, and resurrection. Therefore, while the Christological confessions of Nicaea\nappear to prefigure the theology of Prudentius in his pastiche, Liber Cathemerinon, a closer\nanalysis reveals that his conception of salvation is inconsistent with the underlying\nsoteriological impetus of Nicene theology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.634 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".