MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062768220

When do people leave in-home supportive services?

2014· dissertation· en· W7062768220 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaby boomersQuarter (Canadian coin)Older peoplePopulationCohortRetirement communityPopulation ageingLong-term care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Projections vary, but those who estimate populations agree that the number of retirees will increase dramatically as waves of Baby Boomers retire.No one can say for certain how many of the retiring Baby Boomers will require assistance to live out their years.The expectation is that about a quarter of California's population will be 65 or older by 2060, and more of them will be low-income women who live alone.An analysis of In-Home Supportive Services use offers insight into how the program has been used thus far to help low-income and disabled people 65 and older live safely in their own homes.After 10 years, the length of the study, almost a quarter of the study cohort was still in the program.As care models for the elderly meet more of their needs, knowing who have been users of In-Home Supportive Services can help understand that piece of the care puzzle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207