Water source of concern: an architectural response to the implications of the Winnipeg aqueduct on a way of life in Shoal Lake 40 First Nation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis focuses on the community of Shoal Lake 40 First Nation \nin Northwestern Ontario and the impact of the Winnipeg Aqueduct on a way \nof life. This thesis aims to present an architectural response which provides a \nrestorative environment for a community, as well as developing a sustainable \neconomy within that community. The main architectural response includes \na water purifcation centre, a community greenhouse and a constructed \nwetlands park. Potable water will then be available to the community’s \nresidents. Once this is established the second phase will be an eco-lodge that \nincorporates the living museum previously established within the community, \nalong with a series of cabins, as this will promote eco-tourism. A series of \nlandscape and low impact design strategies are also planned throughout the \nproposal across a spectrum of design scales, from the master plan, to the \nbuilding scale, including the ecological. Through these phased interventions \nover time, the community of Shoal Lake 40 First Nation will frst provide \npotable water to its residents, and then subsequently continue to develop a \nsustainable community
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".