Співробітництво США та Канади в сфері безпеки і оборони на сучасному етапі \n(US and Canada cooperation in security & defense on the present stage)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
У статті проаналізовано характер і ключові аспекти \nспівробітництва Канади та США у сфері оборони та безпеки на дво- та багатосторонньому рівнях. Розглянуто головні платформи співпраці двох країн у військовій сфері. Простежено еволюцію відносин між Канадою і США у ХХІ ст. \nДосліджено внесок двох країн у підтримку миру та безпеки у \nсвіті і їх співпрацю в рамках НАТО. \n(The article analyzes the nature and key aspects of Canada-US \ncooperation in the field of defense and security at the bilateral \nand multilateral levels. The main platforms of cooperation of the \ntwo countries in the military sphere are considered. The evolution \nof Canada-US relations in the 21st century has been traced. The \ncontribution of the two countries to the promotion of peace and \nsecurity in the world and their cooperation within NATO are \nexamined.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it