Zooarchaeology of the Third millennium BCE: the smelting quarter of Valencina de la Concepción (Seville).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presentamos el estudio zooarqueológico del conjunto faunístico registrado en el barrio metalúrgico de Valencina de la Concepción (Sevilla), centro político de la red de jerarquización (relaciones centro/periferia) del Valle del Guadalquivir durante el III Milenio A.N.E. Fue analizado con el objetivo de conocer la dieta, la explotación animal y las relaciones sociales, a través de la identificación y clasificación taxonómica, el cálculo de la abundancia relativa y la división ósea por regiones anatómicas. Además, se reconocieron los diversos fenómenos que interaccionaron y afectaron al conjunto óseo (procesos tafonómicos). El compendio de los análisis realizados reflejó un modelo de conducta caracterizado por una explotación de especies domésticas sacrificadas en edad adulta, una presencia elevada de huesos con utilidad alimenticia gracias a la representaci ón de partes esqueléticas (%MAU, valores observados/esperados y test de chi-cuadrado o X2), un patrón de fragmentación debido a procesos posdeposicionales y una amalgama de alteraciones sobre las superficies óseas que reflejan la acción tanto humana y animal como de los agentes abióticos en el registro faunístico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".