Affordability and Livability in 21st-century Canadian Dwelling Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation explores affordable housing options in Canada’s westernmost Province, British Columbia in the 21st century. The projects are carried out based on corporations between provincial housing programs, the architects’ and communities’ commitment as well as the private building sectors. The aim of this dissertation is to emphasise the role and impact of architecture on gentrification, from an art historical perspective. <br /> The depicted case studies will be examined in context of the neighbourhood they are placed in, which are either in the process of urban transition or already gentrified. The premise is to elaborate more on the question: What role does architecture play in the process of gentrifying neighbourhoods and how does affordable housing fit in this scenario? Findings show that despite the lack of constitutional right to affordable and liveable housing in Canada there are significant architectural projects that help to meet the needs and desires of low to middle income tenants and home owners. Since origins of affordable housing can be traced back to Europe’s late 19th and early 20th century a brief overview will be given on the emergence of the idea of housing settlements, arts-and-crafts-movement, Red Vienna and housing politics under the Weimar Republic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".