Adaptable Housing in Northern Canada Responding to the environmental and cultural needs of the Inuit in Canada’s North
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les sociétés d’habitation gouvernementales responsables de superviser la production de maisons surl’immense territoire que représente le Nord canadien privilégient un type de production centralisé, faisanten sorte qu’un modèle commun de topologie est appliqué à des communautés diverses. Laconception des maisons est prise en charge dans le sud du pays, par des professionnels qui reproduisentdes modèles d’habitations du sud et priorisent le concept de première utilisation.Le présent rapport remet en question la pertinence d’une telle approche centralisée à l’égard du logementsocial. Il soutient que l’accent sur le court terme ne prend pas en compte le besoin de créer deshabitations qui répondent à des contextes environnementaux et culturels particuliers. Il propose uneapproche adaptative du logement et démontre que le modèle centralisé peut être modifié afin de répondreà des impératifs géographiques particuliers.[...]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".