The Activity of the State-Owned Enterprises in Ukraine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is aimed at researching activities of the State-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Ukraine. For this end, an analysis of financial results of activity of the State-owned enterprises was carried out, along with an analysis and a comparison of groups of the SOEs according to recommendations on their future status within the framework of strategy of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine. It is determined that more than a third of the State-owned enterprises recommended to shutdown are dominated by small-assets companies with the close to zero financial results. About a quarter of companies, among which relatively small enterprises are dominating, are subject to privatization. The exception is the State-owned banks, which are the largest actors in the financial market of the country. Almost all major State-owned enterprises are planned to be left in the public ownership. The financial result may not be the only criterion for whether a company be left in the public ownership. It is necessary to pay attention to whether the activity of a company has a social effect which is impossible or very difficult to achieve within the limits of private property. Research on this issue together with development of relevant recommendations are the topic of further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".