MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7063796035

Análisis de la rotación del personal de la empresa Corporación Mía Internacional SAC- San Luis 2018 (Tesis Parcial)

2019· dissertation· en· W7063796035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemunerationQuarter (Canadian coin)PopulationData collectionReliability (semiconductor)Production (economics)Statistical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT
\nStaff rotation is present in all organizations, the purpose of this thesis is to analyze, determine the rotation of the employees of the company Mia International SAC - San Luis 2018, the research is quantitative descriptive type, the population is made up of 120 employees where 40 employees are those who resigned until the third quarter of the year and 80 active employees within the organization where it was constituted by 53 women and 85 men. For the data collection of the "staff rotation questionnaire", elaborated by (Crisostomo Olivares, J. 2015), the validity was determined by the expert judgment and the reliability with the Alpha coefficient of Cron Bach (, 866 ) the data collected were tabulated, where 100% of employees 22% are satisfied with respect to remuneration as workloads, review of corporate benefits, while 51% are unsatisfied with respect to opportunity, adaptability, leadership said results is analyzed in reference to the perception of the employees where they will allow the company to make decisions to improve the high turnover that occurs, of not taking into account the results this will lead to the reduction of production generating economic losses to the company .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207