MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7063840874

The Acculturation Experiences of Newcomer Healthcare Workers in Rural Canada: A Case Study

2024· other· en· W7063840874 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationThematic analysisQualitative researchHealth careContext (archaeology)ReflexivityCoping (psychology)Rural healthFocus group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The acculturation experiences of newcomer healthcare workers in rural Canada are complex and influenced by individual, community, and systemic factors. My study explored how these workers navigated acculturation within rural Canadian communities and workplaces, using Berry's model of acculturation as a framework. I examined the strategies of integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization, shaped by the rural context. 
\nI employed a qualitative case study methodology, focusing on a specific rural municipality in Canada. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with newcomer healthcare workers, community members, and coworkers from a healthcare facility. Reflexive thematic analysis facilitated an in-depth exploration of participants' lived experiences, and the identification of key themes related to their acculturation process. 
\nMy findings revealed that the rural context presented unique challenges and opportunities. Challenges included navigating infrastructural barriers like inadequate transportation and housing, coping with work-related stress, and managing cultural differences in the workplace. Conversely, strong community support systems and inclusive workplace policies positively impacted adaptation. I highlighted the importance of community engagement, social interaction, and the visible contributions of newcomers in fostering a sense of belonging. 
\nMoreover, my research emphasized the dual nature of acculturation, where both newcomers and host communities engaged in mutual adaptation. Community-driven initiatives, informal social networks, and supportive relationships with colleagues were crucial in helping newcomers feel welcomed and valued. However, areas for improvement were identified, such as enhancing rural infrastructure and providing targeted support to address acculturative stress. 
\nMy study contributes to the academic discourse on acculturation by providing evidence on the experiences of newcomer healthcare workers in rural settings. It highlights the need for policies fostering inclusive environments to enhance their well-being. The insights gained can inform the development of responsive support systems, programs, and policies aimed at improving the retention and integration of newcomer healthcare workers in rural Canadian communities. 
\nBy addressing specific challenges and leveraging identified strengths, rural communities can better support the acculturation process and benefit from the valuable contributions of newcomer healthcare workers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)Same topicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationFrench-language works237,207