MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7063912398

Annual Report of the Ohio Academy of Science 1944

2005· other· en· W7063912398 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMarquette UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityAlpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical SocietyAmerican Society of NaturalistsAmerican Ornithologists' UnionCarnegie Foundation for the Advancement of TeachingBotanical Society of AmericaBattelleYork UniversityAmerican Association for Cancer ResearchPeabody CollegeU.S. Department of CommerceArmy Research OfficeOhio Academy of ScienceSmithsonian InstitutionBowling Green State UniversityYale UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAnnual reportGeorge (robot)Year-endingTechnical report
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a part of the centennial program of Capital University, the Academy was invited to meet on the campus of Capital and to enjoy the facilities of the new Science Hall.The meetings were held on April 27, 28, and 29.The local committee, under the chairmanship of Dr. R. M. Geist, had made splendid provision for all needs.The registration for the meeting hit an all-time high and the quality of the meetings seems to be improving each year.Each section of the Academy had a good program and one of the outstanding features of the meeting was the second Annual Science Day of the Junior Academy.This project has developed very rapidly and is proving to be an extremely valuable part of the program of The Senior Academy.The annual banquet and business meeting was held in the Refectory at Capital University on Friday evening at 6:45.Dr. R. M. Geist served as toastmaster, greetings for the host institution were extended by President Harold L. Yochum and the response was given by Dr. E. L. Rice.The presidential address was given by Dr. Paul B. Sears on the title, "Conservation in Theory and Practice."The annual report of the past year's activities presented by the secretary included a most gratifying membership report.Last year we had passed the 1000 mark in our total membership.This year we were seven members short of the 1200 mark.Two hundred sixty-one new members were added in the past year-an all-time record for a single year.Unfortunately we loose some members each year.The following persons were announced as newly elected Fellows of the Academy:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2330.139

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207