Alpaca embryo transfer on a private Canadian farm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated the feasibility of using an embryo transfer protocol in an alpaca farm in Canada. Alpaca donors and recipients were synchronized with 2 doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), 12 days apart. In donors (n = 5), superstimulation was induced with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) given daily (40 mg) for 5 days beginning 2 days after the second GnRH treatment. Cloprostenol was given on the last day of FSH, the donors were bred 2 days later, embryos were collected 7 days after breeding. In recipients (n = 8), the second dose of GnRH was given the day before donor mating, and embryos were transferred on the day of donor collection. On average (± SEM), 5.2 ± 1.4 corpora lutea were detected and 2.5 ± 1.2 transferable embryos were collected in the donors. A mature corpus luteum was detected in 6/8 synchronized recipients and a single embryo was transferred to each. One recipient alpaca became pregnant and delivered a healthy baby 349 days after embryo transfer. This is the first report of successful embryo transfer in alpacas in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".