MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064032552

ADOT’S NEW INTERSTATE: A SONORAN DESERT COMMUNITY’S INPUT DURING THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS

2021· article· en· W7064032552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesert (philosophy)Transportation planningProcess (computing)Regional planningSection (typography)Community planning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a day and age where much of the United States has stopped building new limited access interstate highways, Interstate 11 (I-11) has been proposed to link Mexico with Canada by freeway. Instead of co-locating the southern section of I-11 with I-10, an existing interstate, transportation officials have proposed a new highway that would bisect Avra Valley, an environmentally sensitive region in the Sonoran Desert, located to the Northwest of Tucson, Arizona. Despite an overwhelming consensus from community members that co-locating with an existing Interstate was preferred to a new corridor through Avra Valley, planners moved forward with the Avra Valley proposal. To address the extent to which the concerns, as expressed by residents of Avra Valley and surrounding communities, was addressed during the transportation planning process, archival planning documents were considered. This was done without full consideration of community opinion in their route analysis, which was possible because project leaders had final say over decision making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0270.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207