MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064039968

Akut koroner sendrom geçiren hastalarda fonksiyonel kapasite, günlük yaşam aktiviteleri ve yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi

2018· dissertation· en· W7064039968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNottingham Health ProfileQuality of life (healthcare)Activities of daily livingHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleRehabilitationPsychosocial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oflazoğlu, M. Evaluation of Functional Capacity, Quality of Life And Activities of Daily Living in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Health Sciences Institute, Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Program, Master of Science Thesis, Ankara, 2018. Physical, psychological and emotional impact of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can cause a decline in quality of life in the middle and long term. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of ACS on functional capacity, activities of daily living, psychosocial status, and quality of life and to compare the results with a control group. Forty-six patients with acute coronary syndromes and 46 asemptomatic people were included in the study. Functional capacity using 6-minute walking test (6MWT), activities of daily living using Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Glittre Activities of Daily Living test (Glittre ADL), quality of life using Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and Short Form-36 (SF-36), anxiety and depression levels using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were evaluated. In this study, the ACS group was found to have a significantly lower 6MWT distance and COPM scores, a higher Glittre ADL test duration and higher HADS scores than the control group of individuals (p˂0,05). All scores NHP, except for social isolation, and all SF-36 scores were statistically significant in favor of the control group (p˂0,05). There was a positive correlation between COPM scores and 6MWT distance and all scores of SF-36 (p˂0,05). There was a negative correlation between COPM scores and Glittre ADL test duration, HADS all scores, NHP scores (excluding social isolation) (p˂0,05). The results showed that in comparison with control group, functional capacity, activities of daily living performance and quality of life were reduced, anxiety and depression levels were higher in patients with ACS. For this reason, it is very important to evaluate ACS patients in terms of these concepts, to determine their limitations and to participate in appropriate rehabilitation programs.
\nKey Words: acute coronary syndrome, functional capacity, activities of daily living, quality of life, depression

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it